COP 28 summit is over. But it's not effective for curtailing climate change. Why? Let's see.
I'm not going to write summit start to end. To summarize, It has started with too many scandals, although some improvement achieved. 100 states has supported phasing out fossil fuels, fossil fuel firstly agreed as a source of climate change first time in final agreement in COP summits. But I don't think this is enough. Firstly, I's been used and it'll continued to use by petrol states and petrol companies for greenwashing. Secondly, It's only advisory. Some agreements can be reached between states, but they are not checked whether compliance is made or not and no punishment for violator states. There is need a check mechanism for countries, to control they are doing what they have promised. Third problem is the final agreement negotiations. Only one country can stop final agreement negotiations for their own ambitions. Also, the summit needs a fair voting mechanism to support ambitious plans to reduce climate change and for participants to easily make contributions. In the end, it's not effective and it needs to be reformed immediately. Climate activists, scientists can press countries to reformal of COP summits. And for the people, please vote in your country to environmental friendly politicians.
Subjectivity is a series of articles aimed at sharing the views of writers on Freepolithink.